Imagine standing at an ATM, withdrawing your hard-earned money, only to later find your account drained by an unknown transaction. This scenario, though alarming, is becoming increasingly common as ATM fraud evolves into more sophisticated schemes. In recent years, financial criminals have harnessed technology to exploit vulnerabilities, causing significant losses for individuals and financial institutions alike. Understanding these risks and the statistics behind them is crucial for both awareness and prevention.
Editor’s Choice
- Imposter scams generated over 1 million reports and more than $3.5 billion in consumer losses.
- The FTC brought 40 fraud-related law enforcement actions and obtained over $1.8 billion in redress for consumers.
- 74.7% of individuals sentenced for credit card and other financial instrument fraud were men.
- 92.7% of offenders sentenced for credit card and other financial instrument fraud received prison terms.
- The average sentence for credit card and other financial instrument fraud was 26 months.
- The median loss in credit card and other financial instrument fraud cases was $154,919.
- 24.2% of credit card and other financial instrument fraud cases involved losses greater than $550,000.
- Older adults over 60 were more than 3 times as likely as younger adults to report losing money to Bitcoin ATM scams.
Recent Developments
- ATM jackpotting incidents topped 700 in 2025, causing more than $20 million in losses across the U.S.
- Federal prosecutors had charged 93 defendants in a major ATM jackpotting scheme, with total losses exceeding $6 million and another $1.74 million attempted.
- Bitcoin ATM scams cost Americans more than $333.5 million from January through November 2025, up from roughly $250 million in 2024.
- More than 12,000 Bitcoin ATM scam complaints were reported in 2025, with over 10,000 victims identified.
- People age 60+ were more than 3 times as likely as younger adults to report a Bitcoin ATM scam loss.
- Global payment card fraud losses totaled $33.41 billion in 2024, down 1.2% from $33.83 billion in 2023.
- The U.S. accounted for 41.87% of global card fraud losses while representing 26.31% of worldwide card volume.
- The Crypto ATM Fraud Prevention Act was introduced in February 2025, proposing a $2,000 daily cap and a $10,000 total limit over 14 days for new users.
Fraud Trends Across Online and Mobile Banking Channels
- 71% of respondents reported that fraud most commonly occurs in online or mobile banking channels, highlighting the growing risks in digital finance.
- Online banking accounts for 44% of reported fraud cases, making it the most targeted channel among users.
- Mobile banking represents 27% of fraud incidents, showing that smartphone-based transactions are also highly vulnerable.
- The data suggests that digital banking platforms collectively dominate fraud activity, emphasizing the need for stronger security measures and user awareness.
Impact of ATM Fraud on Financial Institutions
- U.S. ATM attack cases surged 600% since 2019, increasing operational and fraud-management pressure on banks.
- More than 3,500 financial institutions were affected by skimming-related compromises in 2025.
- FICO issued over 3,200 compromised card reports in 2025, a 90% year-over-year increase in compromise events.
- Identified compromised debit cards exceeded 243,000 in 2025, up 5% from 2024.
- 70% of 2025 compromise events were concentrated in the top 10 states, raising regional exposure for issuers there.
- 90% of compromised ATMs in 2025 were non-bank terminals, especially in convenience stores and gas stations.
Credit Card Fraud Reports by Age Group
- Ages 30-39 reported the most credit card identity theft cases at 131,297.
- Ages 20-29 recorded 81,362 credit card fraud reports, the second-highest among all age groups.
- Ages 40-49 logged 85,773 credit card fraud cases in the FTC data.
- People ages 50-59 reported 53,580 credit card fraud incidents.
- Adults ages 60-69 accounted for 30,510 reported credit card fraud cases.
- Ages 70-79 filed 11,569 credit card fraud reports.
- Consumers age 80 and over reported 2,447 credit card fraud cases.
POS Skimming Devices
- FICO reported over 3,200 compromise reports tied to card skimming in 2025, up 90% year over year.
- Identified compromised debit cards rose to more than 243,000 in 2025, a 5% increase from 2024.
- More than 3,500 financial institutions were affected by skimming-related compromises in 2025.
- 70% of all 2025 compromise events were concentrated in the top 10 states.
- 90% of 2025 compromises occurred at non-bank ATMs, including terminals in convenience stores and gas stations.
- In 2024, total compromised debit cards fell 27% to 231,000+ despite skimming remaining widespread.
- Compromised debit cards increased 30% in the second half of 2024 versus the first half.
- Compromise events climbed 46% in the second half of 2024 compared with the first half.
Attempted Check Fraud by Deposit Channel
- The average fraudulent check value was $13,648 at branches.
- The average fraudulent check value was $6,408 at ATMs.
- The average fraudulent check value was $3,240 through mobile deposit.
- Branch deposits accounted for 51% of attempted check deposit fraud activity.
- Mobile deposits represented 31% of attempted check deposit fraud activity.
- ATM deposits made up 18% of attempted check deposit fraud activity.
- 23% of ATM check fraud deposits occurred within the first 30 days of account opening.
- 19% of the total value of ATM check deposits made within the first 30 days of account opening was fraudulent.
Card Skimming Fraud and Increasing Compromise
- Card skimming compromise reports in the U.S. rose more than 90% in 2025, surpassing 3,200 total cases.
- Identified compromised debit cards topped 243,000 in 2025, up 5% from 2024.
- More than 3,500 financial institutions were impacted by skimming-related compromises in 2025.
- 70% of skimming compromise events in 2025 were concentrated in the top 10 U.S. states.
- 90% of 2025 skimming compromises occurred at non-bank ATMs, especially in convenience stores and gas stations.
- In 2024, compromised debit cards totaled 231,000+, even after a 27% annual decline from 2023.
- Compromise events increased 46% in the second half of 2024 versus the first half.
- Compromised debit cards jumped 30% in the second half of 2024 compared with the first half.
Most Common Types of Fraud by Case Volume
- Synthetic identity fraud leads at 44%, making it the most frequently reported fraud type in the past year.
- Account takeover (ATO) fraud accounts for 42%, showing how compromised user accounts remain a major threat.
- Authorized push payment (APP) fraud represents 37%, highlighting the risks tied to real-time payment systems and social engineering scams.
- First-party, friendly, and chargeback fraud make up 35%, indicating that disputes and misuse by legitimate users are still widespread.
- Check fraud also stands at 35%, proving that traditional payment methods continue to face significant fraud risks despite digital growth.
Consumer Awareness and Protection Measures
- 59% of consumers have received a fraud alert from their bank about suspicious account activity.
- Among those who received bank fraud alerts, 96% said the alerts were valuable.
- 87% of bank customers said their bank takes proactive steps to protect them from fraud and scams.
- 74% of consumers believe their bank does more than other industries to protect them from fraud.
- Banks were the most trusted fraud protectors at 50%, versus 8% for healthcare providers and 8% for fintech payment providers.
- In 2025, the FTC received 3 million fraud reports from consumers.
- Reported consumer fraud losses reached $15.9 billion in 2025, up from more than $12 billion in 2024.
- The FTC brought 40 fraud-related law enforcement actions and obtained over $1.8 billion in consumer redress in fiscal 2025.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
How many debit cards were identified as compromised in U.S. skimming incidents in 2025?
More than 243,000 cards were identified as compromised, up 5% from 2024.
How many financial institutions were affected by skimming-related compromises in 2025?
More than 3,500 financial institutions were affected in 2025.
What share of 2025 skimming compromises occurred in the top 10 U.S. states?
The top 10 states accounted for 70% of all compromises in 2025.
What share of compromised ATMs were non-bank terminals in 2025?
About 90% of compromises occurred at non-bank ATMs in 2025.
How many fraud reports did the FTC receive from consumers in 2025?
The FTC received 3 million fraud reports from consumers in 2025.
Conclusion
ATM fraud remains a critical concern for consumers and financial institutions alike as technology evolves. The ATM fraud underscores the importance of proactive measures, from robust consumer education to advanced fraud prevention tools. While innovations like contactless ATMs and automated fraud detection are making strides, increased collaboration and global standardization are essential for long-term protection. As this year progresses, staying informed and vigilant will be key to mitigating risks and ensuring a secure financial future.
DTDanial Thompsan
Really insightful article, Barry! It’s wild how sophisticated ATM skimming devices have gotten over the years. I remember when skimmers were pretty easy to spot if you were paying attention, but now, with these devices being so darn covert, you’d need a magnifying glass and some serious know-how to catch them. It’s a constant cat and mouse game between the tech on these fraudsters and the security measures banks put up. Do you think there’s an end in sight, or will this just keep escalating?
LMLia M.
That’s a good point, Danial. But I wonder, wouldn’t increasing digital payment methods reduce the use of ATMs and thus, potentially lower ATM fraud?
KVKurt V.
Interesting discussion here. I always find it remarkable how much technology is advancing, even if it’s for the wrong purposes.
MQMaggie Q
Great article Barry. I always try to stay on top of these things to protect my family’s money learning about skimming devices was super helpful.
JKJeff K
While the section on ATM fraud’s impact on financial institutions is comprehensive, I believe it underestimates the broader economic implications. Financial losses from fraud are merely the tip of the iceberg. We also need to consider the erosion of consumer trust, which can have far-reaching effects on the financial ecosystem. The direct costs are quantifiable, sure, but the indirect costs, such as increased security measures and insurance premiums, can accumulate quickly. Moreover, as institutions pass these costs onto consumers, we could see shifts in consumer behavior towards more cashless transactions. This shift, while potentially reducing ATM fraud, may introduce new vulnerabilities in digital payments. It’s a complex issue that requires a multi-faceted approach, integrating stronger regulatory frameworks, advanced technologies, and consumer education.