Rabby Wallet Statistics 2026: Installs, Fees, and Chains

Rabby Wallet now spans roughly 1.4 million installs across Chrome, iOS, and Android while collecting $4.88 million in annualized swap fees as of the June 2026 DefiLlama snapshot. That pairing puts the DeBank-built wallet squarely in the security-first niche of the EVM crowd, without the consumer scale of MetaMask or Trust Wallet.

Key Takeaways

• $4.88 million in annualized swap fees flowed through the Rabby built-in swap at the DeFi Llama protocol-page snapshot of $4.88 million annualized and $83,625 over 30 days.
• $83,625 in fees moved in the trailing 30 days, with Ethereum contributing $31,835 and Arbitrum $18,966.
• 1.4 million total estimated installs spanned Chrome at 800,000 users, Google Play at 466,800 downloads, and iOS at 90,000 estimated downloads.
• 0.25% is the built-in Rabby swap fee, the rate Rabby announced when it completed the new releases for Rabby Extension, Rabby Desktop, and Rabby Mobile.
• 5 tagged releases shipped inside three weeks, ending with v0.93.96 published_at 2026-06-26.
• 141+ EVM-compatible chains are reachable, but Solana support remains an open request via issue #2585 with no maintainer response.
• $25 million in Series A funding at a $200 million valuation closed in December 2021 under a Sequoia China lead.

Editor’s Choice

• Annualized swap-fee revenue: $4.88 million on the DefiLlama protocol page.
• Latest release version: v0.93.96, published on 2026-06-26.
• GitHub repository scale: 1,853 stars, 575 forks, 131 open issues on RabbyHub/Rabby.
• Built-in swap fee versus MetaMask: Rabby Swap charges a 0.25% fee on top of network gas versus MetaMask’s 0.875% fee, a roughly 71% lower wallet take from Rabby.
• Apple App Store rating: 3.4 out of 5 from 1,200 Ratings, listed under developer OPCODE LABS PTE. LTD.
• Bridge coverage via LI.FI: Ten-plus chains and L2s through an 18-bridge aggregation stack since Aug 20, 2024.
• DeBank parent funding aggregate: $36 million total across 22 investors per the investor list.

Swap-Fee Revenue by Chain

Rabby’s revenue rides almost entirely on the built-in swap, a 0.25% fee in its built-in swap, introduced when Rabby completed the new releases for Rabby Extension, Rabby Desktop, and Rabby Mobile.

• Ethereum drives $31,835 of trailing 30-day fees, the chain lead.
• Arbitrum follows at $18,966, then BSC at $13,344 and Base at $13,079.
• Polygon brings $3,426; Avalanche adds $1,427.
• Ethereum alone accounted for about 38% of trailing 30-day fees.
• Top four chains together carry roughly 92% of fee revenue.

Source: DefiLlama, June 30, 2026.

By the numbers: Rabby’s June 2026 swap month is small but heavily concentrated. Ethereum alone carried about 38% of trailing 30-day Rabby fees, and the top four chains together accounted for roughly 92% of fee revenue. Every dollar in that column is a swap a real user signed, which makes the chain mix the cleanest read on where Rabby users actually live.

The annualized line is well off the older figures that circulated in trade-press summaries, reflecting both a slower swap month and aggregator absorption inside dApps.

Release Cadence Pulse from GitHub

RabbyHub/Rabby is the engineering heartbeat of the wallet, and the tag history shows a shipping pace most browser-extension wallets do not match.

• 5 tagged releases shipped in 21 calendar days, from v0.93.92 to v0.93.96.
• Latest: v0.93.96 on 2026-06-26; oldest in the run: v0.93.92 on 2026-06-05.
• Stars 1,853, Forks 575, Open issues 131 on RabbyHub/Rabby.
• TypeScript covers 94.1% of the codebase per the public repository metadata.
• Average gap between tags inside the window: roughly every 4 days.

Source: GitHub Releases API, RabbyHub/Rabby, captured June 30, 2026.

The Least Authority audit findings make that cadence more salient. Their key recommendation was changing the encryption algorithm from AES-CBC to AES-GCM, drawn from the Least Authority audit. A repo that ships every four days during a fix window is harder to dismiss as abandoned, which matters when a security audit recommends a cryptographic primitive change.

Don't chase the news. Let us curate it.

You get one weekly briefing with only the stories that matter. If the market is quiet, we skip it.

Email address

Get the Weekly Briefing - it's free!

Read by pros at Visa, Mastercard, Vanguard, and the FDIC.

Recent Developments

• June 26, 2026: Rabby tagged release v0.93.96 with published_at 2026-06-26T15:50:55Z.
• June 30, 2026: DefiLlama recorded Fees 30d of $83,625 for Rabby Wallet on the protocol page.
• March 2026: Mezo confirmed that Rabby Wallet is now officially supported on Mezo, calling it one of the most-requested wallets in the community.
• October 18, 2024: Least Authority completed a security audit of Rabby Wallet with the final audit report dated October 18, 2024.
• August 20, 2024: LI.FI’s announcement detailed bridge transactions across 10+ leading chains and L2s, including Ethereum, Linea, Base, BSC, and Scroll.

Installs and Ratings Across Platforms

Rabby’s install base is wide but not deep. The 1.4 million Total Estimated Installs aggregator figure breaks down across three distribution channels:

• Chrome Web Store: 800,000 installs (the wallet’s distribution anchor).
• Google Play: 466,800 downloads.
• iOS App Store: 90,000 estimated downloads.
• Cross-platform rating aggregate: 3.93 / 5 stars.
• Chrome rating: 4.0 stars; Google Play: 3.9 stars.
• Apple App Store: 3.4 out of 5 from 1,200 Ratings, listed under developer OPCODE LABS PTE. LTD.
• By 2025, Rabby reached 4.2 million global installs (self-reported milestone).

Ratings tell a more measured story than raw install counts. Self-reported install milestones capture uninstalls less aggressively than live store counters, which is why the cross-store aggregate today reads lower than the older self-reported high.

For context on the mobile wallets bracket Rabby competes inside, the Pinkbrains 2026 wallet roundup reports MetaMask with over 30 million monthly active users and total accounts reported north of 100 million. Rabby is small next to MetaMask’s MAU at the install level; the right frame for everything that follows: this is the security-first niche, not the consumer mainstream.

WalletBeat Independent Scorecard

The scorecard from WalletBeat is the most underweighted data point in most Rabby coverage, and it pulls in two directions.

• Overall: Stage 0 designation, WalletBeat’s floor tier.
• Security: 2 of 7; hardware wallet support passes; audits and scam prevention fail.
• Privacy: 0 of 5; no category attribute passes.
• Self-Sovereignty: 2 of 6; unruggability and portability pass; chain verification fails.
• Transparency: 1 of 5; source visibility passes; license fails.

Source: WalletBeat, captured June 30, 2026.

Stage 0 is WalletBeat’s floor designation: Rabby’s overall stage on the WalletBeat scorecard is Stage 0. WalletBeat marks Security audits FAIL on the basis of unaddressed flaws and Privacy 0 of 5. On the other side of the ledger, Account unruggability PASS because Private keys never leave the wallet, and Account portability PASS by using BIP-39/32/44 standards.

Chain Expansion Timeline

Rabby’s chain expansion has been steady but exclusively EVM. The biggest community-facing non-event was GitHub issue #2585, the Solana integration request, which stayed open with no maintainer responses, no assignees, no labels, no branches or pull requests linked at capture.

The list shape explains why Rabby fee revenue concentrates on Ethereum and Arbitrum: the bigger integrations have been Ethereum-adjacent, and the newer Mezo and Tempo additions in 2026 sit on the smaller side of swap demand.

Rabby Swap Fee Versus Competing Wallets

The Rabby take is the single most-cited reason DeFi-heavy users keep Rabby in the rotation, and a quick comparison shows why.

• Rabby Swap charges a 0.25% built-in swap fee on top of network gas.
• MetaMask carries an 0.875% built-in swap fee.
• Phantom (EVM mode) carries an 0.85% built-in swap fee per the 2026 review roundup.
• Rabby’s wallet take runs about 71% below MetaMask’s.
• Worked example: a $50 swap costs $0.125 Rabby fee plus ~$1.20 gas = $1.325 total.
• The same $50 swap at MetaMask’s 0.875% would carry a $0.4375 wallet fee.

A worked example from the GnCrypto review puts the fee structure in dollars, and the basis-point spread compounds across four-figure or larger DeFi trades, where the wallet take starts to matter for active routers.

Security Posture and Audit Trail

Rabby’s defining feature for DeFi users is the on-screen transaction simulation. Pairing the simulation with a hardware signer is the WalletBeat-validated path: Hardware wallet support PASS in the WalletBeat scorecard, and a hardware key plus Rabby’s decoder is what most security-focused users actually run.

Least Authority engagements added structural rigor without rewriting the threat model. The final audit report dated October 18, 2024 surfaced cryptography-modernization recommendations rather than active exploits.

Audits are not security guarantees. They reduce the surface area for known classes of cryptographic and storage errors, but the bigger risk in EVM DeFi remains the malicious contract on the other side of the signature, which is exactly the surface Rabby’s transaction simulation is designed to flag.

DeBank Parent Funding and Team

Rabby is a DeBank product, and DeBank’s capital stack is the cleanest read on how the wallet can hold its swap fee below MetaMask’s without aggressive monetization.

• Series A: $25 million raised at a $200 million valuation in December 2021, led by Sequoia China.
• Strategic investors: Coinbase Ventures, Circle, Crypto.com, Ledger, Dragonfly Capital, Hash Global.
• Aggregate funding: $36 million total across 22 investors.
• Hack VC and Qiming Venture Partners among the later additions.
• Founders on record: Tang Hongbo (Co-founder & Board Chair) and Xu Yong (Founder); company founded Jan 2018.

Worth noting: DeBank’s Series A in December 2021 closed at a $200 million valuation, and the aggregate stack today is $36 million across 22 investors. That capital backing is why Rabby keeps its wallet take below MetaMask’s headline rate; the parent’s portfolio tracker and data feeds subsidize Rabby growth, so wallet revenue is not forced to do all the work.

For broader market context, the DeFi ecosystem Rabby plugs into and the DEX volume passing through aggregators both shape Rabby’s swap take.

Does Rabby Wallet support Solana?

No. Rabby remains an EVM-only wallet as of capture. Community requests for Solana support route through GitHub issue #2585, which stays open with no maintainer responses, no assignees, no labels and no branches or pull requests linked at capture.

Adding a non-EVM chain to a wallet built around the Ethereum account model carries a high architectural cost. Maintainer silence on issue #2585 is the strongest signal that Solana support is not on the near-term roadmap. Users who need Solana coverage today pair Rabby with a separate non-EVM wallet.

Is Rabby Wallet safe to use?

Rabby’s safety profile rests on outside audits, on-screen transaction simulation, and hardware-wallet pairing. The October 18, 2024 final audit report by Least Authority delivered cryptography-modernization recommendations without flagging active exploits. WalletBeat’s Stage 0 grade tempers the picture: Privacy 0/5 and Security audits FAIL on unaddressed flaws at scoring time. The honest read is that Rabby reduces signing-mistake risk for security-aware users, but does not solve the privacy surface or the broader contract-risk surface that no software wallet can.

How many EVM chains does Rabby support?

The current count tracks past EVM-compatible chains and testnets, with the recent expansion focused on smaller and newer networks. Rabby added Rabby Wallet support officially landed on Mezo as one of the most-requested wallets in the community, and the wallet’s bridge layer covers 10+ leading chains and L2s through LI.FI’s aggregation stack of 18 bridges. Coverage of major L2s such as Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Linea, and ZKsync Era is built into the swap and fee routing, with Ethereum still anchoring the bulk of activity.

The watch item ahead is whether the team works through the Least Authority recommendations on subsequent releases, the AES-GCM migration in particular, and whether the chain expansion that brought Mezo and IOTA EVM ever crosses the non-EVM line. The current swap-fee book compounds across the decentralized finance ecosystem, evidencing the Rabby take has product-market fit even without MetaMask-scale revenue.

Conclusion

Rabby Wallet stands today as the most-cited security-focused EVM wallet. Its base spans 1.4 million Total Estimated Installs across a release cadence of 5 tagged versions inside three weeks, ending with v0.93.96 published on 2026-06-26, and a fee economy of Rabby Wallet Fees (Annualized) of $4.88 million on the DefiLlama protocol page.

These numbers also frame what Rabby is not: a consumer-mainstream wallet at MetaMask scale, a privacy-forward wallet at WalletBeat’s higher tiers, or a multi-ecosystem wallet that reaches outside the EVM perimeter.