Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong is warning lawmakers not to tamper with the GENIUS Act, drawing a firm line against what he calls a coordinated push by banks to undercut stablecoin competition in the U.S.
Key Takeaways
- Brian Armstrong calls attempts to reopen the GENIUS Act a “red line” and vows resistance.
- Banks are lobbying for tighter rules on stablecoin rewards, potentially limiting indirect yield models.
- The GENIUS Act, passed in 2025, allows rewards through third parties but bans direct interest payments.
- Proposed changes could stall innovation and tip the market in favor of traditional financial institutions.
What Happened?
Brian Armstrong took to X over the weekend, warning that reopening the GENIUS Act would trigger a backlash from Coinbase and the broader crypto community. His post came amid reports that U.S. banks are pressuring lawmakers to roll back provisions that allow crypto platforms to offer rewards linked to stablecoins. Armstrong described the lobbying as unethical and short-sighted, predicting banks will eventually reverse course once they realize the potential for profit.
Exactly – I’m actually impressed the banks can lobby for this with a straight face and not get kicked out of senator’s offices. It takes some serious mental gymnastics.
— Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) December 26, 2025
We won’t let anyone reopen GENIUS. Red line issue for us. And will keep advocating for our customers and the… https://t.co/6EfF2oBn5A
Coinbase Pushes Back Against Banking Pressure
Armstrong’s comments reflect rising concern within the crypto industry about possible amendments to the GENIUS Act. Enacted in 2025, the law prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying interest directly to users but permits platforms and third parties to distribute rewards derived from reserves.
This legal gray area has become a battleground between banks and fintech firms. Armstrong accused banks of framing the issue as a “safety concern” while actually trying to suppress competition and protect their earnings. He said Coinbase would fight efforts to revise the law, arguing that changes would “stall innovation rather than protect consumers.”
Armstrong also predicted that banks would eventually see the upside and start “lobbying for the ability to pay interest and yield on stablecoins” in the future, calling current opposition “100 percent wasted” and rooted in self-interest, not public risk.
Why the GENIUS Act Matters?
The GENIUS Act was a landmark piece of crypto legislation, creating a structured framework for blockchain payments, compliance standards, and consumer protections. It allowed private stablecoin issuers to legally operate alongside banks under a single regulatory system.
Supporters argue it struck a smart balance, enabling innovation without removing key guardrails. Critics from the banking sector say it gives fintech companies a competitive edge, especially since stablecoin platforms often return more yield to users than traditional savings accounts.
Industry observers highlight a stark difference in interest returns:
- Banks earn about 4 percent on reserves at the Federal Reserve.
- Consumers receive near-zero on standard savings accounts.
- Stablecoin platforms share some of that reserve yield with users via rewards.
Max Avery, a board member of Digital Ascension Group, said in a recent post that banks are now lobbying to restrict these reward models entirely. He dismissed concerns about community bank deposit outflows as unsupported by data, saying “independent research shows zero evidence of disproportionate deposit outflows from community banks.”
Tax Relief and Crypto Growth
The debate over stablecoin rewards is unfolding as Congress weighs broader crypto reforms. A recent draft bill proposes exempting stablecoin payments under $200 from capital gains taxes, making them easier to use for daily purchases. It also includes provisions to delay income recognition from staking and mining rewards for up to five years.
This shows that lawmakers are increasingly viewing crypto as more than speculative trading, and are looking for ways to integrate it into the broader economy.
For Coinbase and others, the concern is that revisiting the GENIUS Act could set a precedent. If yield-sharing is banned or restricted, crypto platforms could lose one of their most consumer-friendly advantages, weakening adoption and tilting the playing field toward traditional banks.
CoinLaw’s Takeaway
In my experience, when banks start framing innovation as a “safety risk,” it’s often a sign they feel threatened. Armstrong calling this a red line isn’t just PR, it reflects real tension at the heart of financial innovation. Stablecoin rewards have become the crypto world’s response to low-interest banking, and if lawmakers give in to pressure now, they could be locking out a future where more people earn more from their own money. I found Armstrong’s prediction particularly telling. Even banks may one day flip positions once they see the upside. Until then, this is a fight worth watching.
